I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
18 of 20 within-ecosystem
，推荐阅读谷歌浏览器【最新下载地址】获取更多信息
算法平均时间最好时间最坏时间空间稳定适用场景冒泡排序O(n²)O(n)O(n²)O(1)✓小数据、教学选择排序O(n²)O(n²)O(n²)O(1)✗小数据、交换代价高插入排序O(n²)O(n)O(n²)O(1)✓小数据、基本有序希尔排序O(n^1.3)O(nlogn)O(n²)O(1)✗中等数据归并排序O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(n)✓大数据、要求稳定快速排序O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(n²)O(logn)✗大数据、通用首选堆排序O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(nlogn)O(1)✗大数据、空间敏感计数排序O(n+k)O(n+k)O(n+k)O(k)✓整数、范围小基数排序O(d(n+k))O(d(n+k))O(d(n+k))O(n+k)✓整数、位数少桶排序O(n+k)O(n+k)O(n²)O(n+k)✓均匀分布数据
Жители Санкт-Петербурга устроили «крысогон»17:52
controller.enqueue(encoder.encode(`${content}`));